18
Stir Up the Transgressive and Taboo
There are always social limits on what one
can do. Some of these, the most elemental taboos, go back
centuries; others are more superficial, simply defining
polite and acceptable behavior. Making your targets feel
that you are leading them past either kind of limit is
immensely seductive. People yearn to explore their dark
side. Not everything in romantic love is supposed to be
tender and soft; hint that you have a cruel, even sadistic
streak. You do not respect age differences, marriage vows,
family ties. Once the desire to transgress draws your
targets to you, it will be hard for them to stop. Take them
further than they imagined—the shared feeling of
guilt and complicity will create a powerful bond.
It is a matter of a certain kind of feeling:
that of being overwhelmed. There are many who have a great fear of
being overwhelmed by someone; for example, someone who makes them
laugh against their will, or tickles them to death, or, worse,
tells them things that they sense to be accurate but which they do
not quite understand, things that go beyond their prejudices and
received wisdom. In other words, they do not want to be seduced,
since seduction means confronting people with their limits, limits
that are supposed to be set and stable but that the seducer
suddenly causes to waver. Seduction is the desire of being
overwhelmed, taken beyond.
—DANIEL SIBONY, L’AMOUR INCONSCIENT
The Lost Self
In March of 1812, the twenty-four-year-old
George Gordon Byron published the first cantos of his poem
Childe Harold. The poem was filled with familiar gothic
imagery—a dilapidated abbey, debauchery, travels to the mysterious
East—but what made it different was that the hero of the poem was
also its villain: Harold was a man who led a life of vice,
disdaining society’s conventions yet somehow going unpunished.
Also, the poem was not set in some faraway land but in present-day
England. Childe Harold created an instant stir, becoming the
talk of London. The first printing quickly sold out. Within days a
rumor made the rounds: the poem, about a debauched young nobleman,
was in fact autobiographical.
Now the cream of society clamored to meet Lord
Byron, and many of them left their calling cards at his London
residence. Soon he was showing up at their homes. Strangely enough,
he exceeded their expectations. He was devilishly handsome, with
curling hair and the face of an angel. His black attire set off his
pale complexion. He did not talk much, which made an impression of
itself, and when he did, his voice was low and hypnotic and his
tone a little disdainful. He had a limp (he was born with a
clubfoot), so when an orchestra struck up a waltz (the dance craze
of 1812), he would stand to the side, a faraway look in his eye.
The ladies went wild over Byron. Upon meeting him, Lady Roseberry
felt her heart beating so violently (a mix of fear and excitement)
that she had to walk away. Women fought to be seated next to him,
to win his attention, to be seduced by him. Was it true that he was
guilty of a secret sin, like the hero of his poem?
Lady Caroline Lamb—wife of William Lamb, son of
Lord and Lady Melbourne—was a glittering young woman on the social
scene, but deep inside she was unhappy As a young girl she had
dreamt of adventure, romance, travel. Now she was expected to play
the role of the polite young wife, and it did not suit her. Lady
Caroline was one of the first to read Childe Harold, and
something more than its novelty stirred her. When she saw Lord
Byron at a dinner party, surrounded by women, she looked at his
face, then walked away; that night she wrote of him in her journal,
“Mad, bad, and dangerous to know” She added, “That beautiful pale
face is my fate.”
The next day, to Lady Caroline’s surprise, Lord
Byron called on her. Evidently he had seen her walking away from
him, and her shyness had intrigued him—he disliked the aggressive
women who were constantly at his heels, as it seemed he disdained
everything, including his success. Soon he was visiting Lady
Caroline daily. He lingered in her boudoir, played with her
children, helped her choose her dress for the day. She pressed him
to talk of his life: he described his brutal father, the untimely
deaths that seemed to be a family curse, the crumbling abbey he had
inherited, his adventures in Turkey and Greece. His life was indeed
as gothic as that of Childe Harold.
Just lately I saw a tight-reined
stallion \ Get the bit in his teeth and bolt \ Like
lightning—yet the minute he felt the reins
slacken, \ Drop loose on his flying mane, \ He
stopped dead. We eternally chafe at restrictions,
covet \ Whatever’s forbidden. (Look how a sick
man who’s told \ No immersion hangs round the
bathhouse.) \ ... Desire \ Mounts for what’s kept
out of reach. A thief’s attracted \ By
burglar-proof premises. How often will love \ Thrive
on a rival’s approval? It’s not your wife’s beauty,
but your own \ Passion for her that gets
us—she must \ Have something, just to have
hooked you. A girl locked up by her \ Husband’s not
chaste but pursued, her fear’s \ A bigger draw than
her figure. Illicit passion— like it \ Or
not—is sweeter. It only turns me on \ When the
girl says, “I’m frightened. ”
—OVID, THE AMORES, TRANSLATED BY PETER
GREEN
—SIGMUND FREUD, “CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PSYCHOLOGY
OF LOVE,” SEXUALITY AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LOVE,
TRANSLATED BY JOAN RIVIÈRE
Within days the two became lovers. Now, though, the
tables turned: Lady Caroline pursued Byron with unladylike
aggression. She dressed as a page and sneaked into his carriage,
wrote him extravagantly emotional letters, flaunted the affair. At
last, a chance to play the grand romantic role of her girlhood
fantasies. Byron began to turn against her. He already loved to
shock; now he confessed to her the nature of the secret sin he had
alluded to in Childe Harold—his homosexual affairs during
his travels. He made cruel remarks, grew indifferent. But this only
seemed to push her further. She sent him the customary lock of
hair, but from her pubis; she followed him in the street, made
public scenes—finally her family sent her abroad to avoid further
scandal. After Byron made it clear the affair was over, she
descended into a madness that would last several years.
In 1813, an old friend of Byron’s, James Webster,
invited the poet to stay at his country estate. Webster had a young
and beautiful wife, Lady Frances, and he knew Byron’s reputation as
a seducer, but his wife was quiet and chaste—surely she would
resist the temptation of a man such as Byron. To Webster’s relief,
Byron barely spoke to Frances, who seemed equally uninterested in
him. Yet several days into Byron’s stay, she contrived to be alone
with him in the billiards room, where she asked him a question: how
could a woman who liked a man inform him of it when he did not
perceive it? Byron scribbled a racy reply on a piece of paper,
which made her blush as she read it. Soon thereafter he invited the
couple to stay with him at his infamous abbey. There, the prim and
proper Lady Frances saw him drink wine from a human skull. They
stayed up late in one of the abbey’s secret chambers, reading
poetry and kissing. With Byron, it seemed, Lady Frances was only
too eager to explore adultery.
That same year, Lord Byron’s half sister Augusta
arrived in London to get away from her husband, who was having
money troubles. Byron had not seen Augusta for some time. The two
were physically similar—the same face, the same mannerisms; she was
Lord Byron as a woman. And his behavior toward her was more than
brotherly. He took her to the theater, to dances, received her at
home, treating her with an intimate spirit that Augusta soon
returned. Indeed the kind and tender attention that Byron showered
on her soon became physical.
Augusta was a devoted wife with three children, yet
she yielded to her half brother’s advances. How could she help
herself? He stirred up a strange passion in her, a stronger passion
than she felt for any other man, including her husband. For Byron,
his relationship with Augusta was the ultimate and crowning sin of
his career. And soon he was writing to his friends, openly
confessing it. Indeed he delighted in their shocked responses, and
his long narrative poem, The Bride of Abydos, takes
brother-sister incest as its theme. Rumors began to spread of
Byron’s relations with Augusta, who was now pregnant with his
child. Polite society shunned him—but women were more drawn to him
than before, and his books were more popular than ever.
Annabella Milbanke, Lady Caroline Lamb’s cousin,
had met Byron in those first months of 1812 when he was the toast
of London. Annabella was sober and down to earth, and her interests
were science and religion. But there was something about Byron that
attracted her. And the feeling seemed to be returned: not only did
the two become friends, to her bewilderment he showed another kind
of interest in her, even at one point proposing marriage. This was
in the midst of the scandal over Byron and Caroline Lamb, and
Annabella did not take the proposal seriously. Over the next few
months she followed his career from a distance, and heard the
troubling rumors of incest. Yet in 1813, she wrote her aunt, “I
consider his acquaintance as so desirable that I would incur the
risk of being called a Flirt for the sake of enjoying it.” Reading
his new poems, she wrote that his “description of Love almost makes
me in love.” She was developing an obsession with Byron, of which
word soon reached him. They renewed their friendship, and in 1814
he proposed again; this time she accepted. Byron was a fallen angel
and she would be the one to reform him.
It did not turn out that way. Byron had hoped that
married life would calm him down, but after the ceremony he
realized it was a mistake. He told Annabella, “Now you will find
that you have married a devil.” Within a few years the marriage
fell apart.
In 1816, Byron left England, never to return. He
traveled through Italy for a while; everyone knew his story—the
affairs, the incest, the cruelty to his lovers. But wherever he
went, Italian women, particularly married noblewomen, pursued him,
making it clear in their own way how prepared they were to be the
next Byronic victim. In truth, the women had become the aggressors.
As Byron told the poet Shelley, “No one has been more carried off
than poor dear me—I’ve been ravished more often than anyone since
the Trojan war.”
Interpretation. Women of Byron’s time were
longing to play a different role than society allowed them. They
were supposed to be the decent, moralizing force in culture; only
men had outlets for their darker impulses. Underlying the social
restrictions on women, perhaps, was a fear of the more amoral and
unbridled part of the female psyche.
Feeling repressed and restless, women of the time
devoured gothic novels and romances, stories in which women were
adventurous, and had the same capacity for good and evil as men.
Books like these helped to trigger a revolt, with women like Lady
Caroline playing out a little of the fantasy life they had had in
their girlhood, where it had to some extent been permitted. Byron
arrived on the scene at the right time. He became the lightning rod
for women’s unexpressed desires; with him they could go beyond the
limits society had imposed. For some the lure was adultery, for
others it was romantic rebellion, or a chance to become irrational
and uncivilized. (The desire to reform him merely covered up the
truth—the desire to be overwhelmed by him.) In all cases it was the
lure of the forbidden, which in this case was more than merely a
superficial temptation: once you became involved with Lord Byron,
he took you further than you had imagined or wanted, since he
recognized no limits. Women did not just fall in love with him,
they let him turn their lives upside down, even ruin them. They
preferred that fate to the safe confines of marriage.
This is how Monsieur Mauclair analyzed
men’s attitude toward prostitutes: “Neither the love
of a passionate but well- brought-up mistress,
nor his marriage to a woman whom he respects, can
replace the prostitute for the human animal in those
perverse moments when he covets the pleasure of
debasing himself without affecting his social
prestige. Nothing can replace this bizarre and
powerful pleasure of being able to say everything,
do everything, profane and parody without any fear
of retribution, remorse, or responsibility. It is
a complete revolt against organized society, his
organized, educated self and especially his
religion. ” Monsieur Mauclair hears the call of
the Devil in this dark passion poetized by
Baudelaire. “The prostitute represents the
unconscious which enables us to put aside our
responsibilities. ”
—NINA EPTON, LOVE AND THE FRENCH
—GOTTFRIED VON STRASSBURG, TRISTAN UND
ISOLDE, QUOTED IN ANDREA HOPKINS,THE BOOK OF COURTLY
LOVE
In some ways, the situation of women in the early
nineteenth century has become generalized in the early
twenty-first. The outlets for male bad behavior—war, dirty
politics, the institution of mistresses and courtesans—have faded
away; today, not just women but men are supposed to be eminently
civilized and reasonable. And many have a hard time living up to
this. As children we are able to vent the darker side of our
characters, a side that all of us have. But under pressure from
society (at first in the form of our parents), we slowly repress
the naughty, rebellious, perverse streaks in our characters. To get
along, we learn to repress our dark sides, which become a kind of
lost self, a part of our psyche buried beneath our polite
appearance.
As adults, we secretly want to recapture that lost
self—the more adventurous, less respectful, childhood part of us.
We are drawn to those who live out their lost selves as adults,
even if it involves some evil or destruction. Like Byron, you can
become the lightning rod for such desires. You must learn, however,
to keep this potential under control, and to use it strategically.
As the aura of the forbidden around you is drawing targets into
your web, do not overplay your dangerousness, or they will be
frightened away. Once you feel them falling under your spell, you
have freer rein. If they begin to imitate you, as Lady Caroline
imitated Byron, then take it further—mix in some cruelty, involve
them in sin, crime, taboo activity, whatever it takes. Unleash the
lost self within them; the more they act it out, the deeper your
hold over them. Going halfway will break the spell and create
self-consciousness. Take it as far as you can.
Baseness attracts everybody.
—JOHANN WOLFGANG GOETHE
Keys to Seduction
Society and culture are based on
limits—this kind of behavior is acceptable, that is not. The limits
are fluid and change with time, but there are always limits. The
alternative is anarchy, the lawlessness of nature, which we dread.
But we are strange animals: the moment any kind of limit is
imposed, physically or psychologically, we are instantly curious. A
part of us wants to go beyond that limit, to explore what is
forbidden.
One of Monsieur Leopold Stern’s
friends rented a bachelor’s pied-à-terre where he
received his wife as a mistress, served her with port
and petits-fours and “experienced all the tingling
excitement of adultery, ” He told Stern that it was a
delightful sensation to cuckold himself.
—NINA EPTON, LOVE AND THE FRENCH
If, as children, we are told not to go past a
certain point in the woods, that is precisely where we want to go.
But we grow older, and become polite and deferential; more and more
boundaries encumber our lives. Do not confuse politeness with
happiness, however. It covers up frustration, unwanted compromise.
How can we explore the shadow side of our personality without
incurring punishment or ostracism? It seeps out in our dreams. We
sometimes wake up with a sense of guilt at the murder, incest,
adultery, and mayhem that goes on in our dreams, until we realize
no one needs to know about it but ourselves. But give a person the
sense that with you they will have a chance to explore the outer
reaches of acceptable, polite behavior, that with you they can vent
some of their closeted personality, and you create the ingredients
for a deep and powerful seduction.
You will have to go beyond the point of merely
teasing them with an elusive fantasy. The shock and seductive power
will come from the reality of what you are offering them. Like
Byron, at a certain point you can even press it further than they
may want to go. If they have followed you merely out of curiosity,
they may feel some fear and hesitation, but once they are hooked,
they will find you hard to resist, for it is hard to return to a
limit once you have transgressed and gone past it. The human cries
out for more, and does not know when to stop. You will determine
for them when it is time to stop.
The moment people feel that something is
prohibited, a part of them will want it. That is what makes a
married man or woman such a delicious target—the more someone is
prohibited, the greater the desire. George Villiers, the Earl of
Buckingham, was the favorite first of King James I, then of James’s
son, King Charles I. Nothing was ever denied him. In 1625, on a
visit to France, he met the beautiful Queen Anne and fell
hopelessly in love. What could be more impossible, more out of
reach, than the queen of a rival power? He could have had almost
any other woman, but the prohibited nature of the queen completely
enflamed him, until he embarrassed himself and his country by
trying to kiss her in public.
Since what is forbidden is desired, somehow you
must make yourself seem forbidden. The most blatant way to do this
is to engage in behavior that gives you a dark and forbidden aura.
Theoretically you are someone to avoid; in fact you are too
seductive to resist. That was the allure of the actor Errol Flynn,
who, like Byron, often found himself the pursued rather than the
pursuer. Flynn was devilishly handsome, but he also had something
else: a definite criminal streak. In his wild youth he engaged in
all kinds of shady activities. In the 1950s he was charged with
rape, a permanent stain on his reputation even though he was
acquitted; but his popularity among women only increased. Play up
your dark side and you will have a similar effect. For your targets
to be involved with you means going beyond their limits, doing
something naughty and unacceptable—to society, to their peers. For
many that is reason to bite the bait.
In Junichiro Tanazaki’s 1928 novel
Quicksand, Sonoko Kakiuchi, the wife of a respectable
lawyer, is bored and decides to take art classes to wile away the
time. There, she finds herself fascinated with a fellow female
student, the beautiful Mitsuko, who befriends her, then seduces
her. Kakiuchi is forced to tell endless lies to her husband about
her involvement with Mitsuko and their frequent trysts. Mitsuko
slowly involves her in all kinds of nefarious activities, including
a love triangle with a bizarre young man. Each time Kakiuchi is
made to explore some forbidden pleasure, Mitsuko challenges her to
go further and further. Kakiuchi hesitates, feels remorse—she knows
she is in the clutches of a devilish young seductress who has
played on her boredom to lead her astray. But in the end, she
cannot help following Mitsuko’s lead—each transgressive act makes
her want more. Once your targets are drawn by the lure of the
forbidden, dare them to match you in transgressive behavior. Any
kind of challenge is seductive. Take it slowly, heightening the
challenge only after they show signs of yielding to you. Once they
are under your spell, they may not even notice how far out on a
limb you have taken them.
The great eighteenth-century rake Duc de Richelieu
had a prediliction for young girls and he would often heighten the
seduction by enveloping them in transgressive behavior, to which
the young are particularly susceptible. For instance, he would find
a way into the young girl’s house and lure her into her bed; the
parents would be just down the hall, adding the proper spice.
Sometimes he would act as if they were about to be discovered, the
momentary fright sharpening the overall thrill. In all cases, he
would try to turn the young girl against her parents, ridiculing
their religious zeal or prudery or pious behavior. The duke’s
stategy was to attack the values that his targets held
dearest—precisely the values that represent a limit. In a young
person, family ties, religious ties, and the like are useful to the
seducer; young people barely need a reason to rebel against them.
The strategy, though, can be applied to a person of any age: for
every deeply held value there is a shadow side, a doubt, a desire
to explore what those values forbid.
In Renaissance Italy, a prostitute would dress as a
lady and go to church. Nothing was more exciting to a man than to
exchange glances with a woman whom he knew to be a whore as he was
surrounded by his wife, family, peers, and church officials. Every
religion or value system creates a dark side, the shadow realm of
everything it prohibits. Tease your targets, get them to flirt with
whatever transgresses their family values, which are often
emotional yet superficial, since they are imposed from the
outside.
One of the most seductive men of the twentieth
century, Rudolph Valentino, was known as the Sex Menace. His appeal
for women was twofold: he could be tender and attentive, but he
also hinted of cruelty. At any moment he could become dangerously
bold, perhaps even a little violent. The studios played up this
double image as much as possible—when it was reported that he had
been abusive to his wife, for example, they exploited the story. A
mix of the masculine and the feminine, the violent and the tender,
will always seem transgressive and appealing. Love is supposed to
be tender and delicate, but in fact it can release violent and
destructive emotions; and the possible violence of love, the way it
breaks down our normal reasonableness, is just what attracts us.
Approach romance’s violent side by mixing a cruel streak into your
tender attentions, particularly in the latter stages of the
seduction, when the target is in your clutches. The courtesan Lola
Montez was known to turn to violence, using a whip now and then,
and Lou Andreas-Salomé could be exceptionally cruel to her men,
playing coquettish games, turning alternately icy and demanding.
Her cruelty only kept her targets coming back for more. A
masochistic involvement can represent a great transgressive
release.
The more illicit your seduction feels, the more
powerful its effect. Give your targets the feeling that they are
committing a kind of crime, a deed whose guilt they share with you.
Create public moments in which the two of you know something that
those around you do not. It could be phrases and looks that only
you recognize, a secret. Byron’s seductive appeal to Lady Frances
was connected to the nearness of her husband—in his company, for
example, she had a love letter of Byron’s hidden in her bosom.
Johannes, the protagonist of Søren Kierkegaard’s The Seducer’s
Diary, sent a message to his target, the young Cordelia, in the
middle of a dinner party they were both attending; she could not
reveal to the other guests that it was from him, for then she would
have to do some explaining. He might also say something in public
that would have a special meaning for her, since it referred to
something in one of his letters. All of this added spice to the
affair by giving it a feeling of a shared secret, even a guilty
crime. It is critical to play on tensions like these in public,
creating a sense of complicity and collusion against the
world.
In the Tristan and Isolde legend, the famous lovers
reach the heights of bliss and exhilaration exactly because
of the taboos they break. Isolde is engaged to King Mark; she will
soon be a married woman. Tristan is a loyal subject and warrior in
the service of King Mark, who is his father’s age. The whole affair
has a feeling of stealing away the bride from the father.
Epitomizing the concept of love in the Western world, the legend
has had immense influence over the ages, and a crucial part of it
is the idea that without obstacles, without a feeling of
transgression, love is weak and flavorless.
People may be straining to remove restrictions on
private behavior, to make everything freer, in the world today, but
that only makes seduction more difficult and less exciting. Do what
you can to reintroduce a feeling of transgression and crime, even
if it is only psychological or illusory. There must be obstacles to
overcome, social norms to flout, laws to break, before the
seduction can be consummated. It might seem that a permissive
society imposes few limits; find some. There will always be limits,
sacred cows, behavioral standards—endless ammunition for stirring
up the transgressive and taboo.
Symbol: The Forest. The children are told not
to go into the forest that lies just beyond the safe
confines of their home. There is no law there, only
wilderness, wild animals, and criminals. But the chance to
explore, the alluring darkness, and the fact that it is
prohibited are impossible to resist. And once inside, they
want to go farther and farther.
Reversal
The reversal of stirring up taboos would be
to stay within the limits of acceptable behavior. That would make
for a very tepid seduction. Which is not to say that only evil or
wild behavior is seductive; goodness, kindness, and an aura of
spirituality can be tremendously attractive, since they are rare
qualities. But notice that the game is the same. A person who is
kind or good or spiritual within the limits that society prescribes
has a weak appeal. It is those who go to the extreme—the Gandhis,
the Krishnamurtis—who seduce us. They do not merely expound a
spiritual life-style, they do away with all personal material
comfort to live out their ascetic ideals. They too go beyond the
limits, transgressing acceptable behavior, because societies would
find it hard to function if everyone went to such lengths. In
seduction, there is absolutely no power in respecting boundaries
and limits.